Stella Nova Journals
Stella Nova JournalsStella Nova Education
Journals for inquiry at the frontier
Independent, interdisciplinary scholarly publishing built around transparent evidence, methodological care, ethical inquiry, and public accessibility.
10distinct journals
one scholarly network
one scholarly network
The Stella Nova journal network
Publication homes built around the work itself.
Stella Nova Journals is not a single undifferentiated venue. It is a network of distinct editorial homes organized around the questions, evidence, methods, audiences, and forms of scholarly labor that each field requires.
Every journal retains its own disciplinary identity and editorial pathway while sharing durable submission, review, issue, indexing, and archival infrastructure.
Ten editorial homes
Stella Nova journal network
Each journal operates inside this shared OJS environment while retaining its own disciplinary identity, editorial mandate, and publication pathway.
Distinct editorial homes
Each journal defines more than a title.
A publication home establishes the intellectual and practical conditions under which a manuscript can be understood, evaluated, improved, published, and preserved.
Aims and scope
The questions, fields, materials, scales, and scholarly conversations the journal is designed to hold.
Editorial position
The journal's relationship to evidence, interpretation, interdisciplinarity, uncertainty, and public responsibility.
Submission types
The forms of work appropriate to the journal, from full research articles to focused methodological or critical contributions.
Review model
A review pathway proportionate to the publication type, evidentiary claims, methods, ethical stakes, and intended audience.
Publication rhythm
Issue planning, inaugural-volume development, revision cycles, production, indexing preparation, and archival continuity.
Ethics, rights, and access
Clear expectations for attribution, permissions, research responsibility, conflicts, author rights, and public accessibility.
Editorial model
From manuscript to public scholarly record.
Scope, evidence, editorial judgment, revision, and publication are connected parts of the same scholarly process.
Choose the editorial home
Begin with the journal whose aims, methods, audience, and disciplinary conversation most closely fit the work.
Make the evidence chain visible
Document sources, provenance, analytical choices, uncertainty, limitations, permissions, and ethical considerations.
Editorial and peer review
Review examines the relationship among the claims made, the evidence presented, the methods used, and the form of publication.
Revision, publication, and archive
Accepted work moves through revision and production into a durable OJS record with issue, indexing, and archival support.
Scholarly commitments
Evidence, method, infrastructure, and public life.
Evidence before assertion
Claims remain proportionate to the quality of evidence, transparency of provenance, appropriateness of method, and uncertainty that remains.
Method before certainty
Observation, interpretation, inference, hypothesis, and speculation remain distinguishable rather than being collapsed into one register.
Durable scholarly infrastructure
OJS supports submissions, editorial decisions, review, revisions, issues, indexing preparation, archives, and transparent publication records.
Public intellectual life
Research serves scholarly communities while remaining attentive to students, practitioners, institutions, communities, and wider publics.